Job safety analysis is also commonly abbreviated JSA. Depending on the place you work, job safety analysis procedures may also be called Job Handling Analysis or JHA, Job Safety and Environment Analysis or JSEA, Job Hazard Breakdown, Task Risk Assessment and so on.
Whatever your company choose to call it, JSA is a very important safety. It's about looking at every step of a job systematically in order to identify, critically assess, and write down hazards and work practices that are safe. It is to make sure that the right controls are put in place so that the work can be done safely.
How effective a JSA would be varies greatly depending on the understanding and experience of the crew completing it and the standard of the JSA processes. There are training available that can make one improve on the consistency and quality of JSA at the place of work.
Just filling the JSA form does not make people safe during the work. It would be of almost no value to bring out hazard and develop controls if the most critical hazards are not looked at. The controls should always be appropriate, the controls should be in place and maintained and what is required should be properly communicated.
The procedure is much more important than a piece of paper that documents the process. A well developed JSA used properly is a useful safety tool. However, a poor JSA may not only be ineffective in preventing injury, but can create an additional hazard; a false sense of safety.
A poor JSA paints the picture that all the needed controls are in place and for that matter the job would be carried out safely. For this reason, members in the team may relax, not be too cautious, and would be caught in the trap of uncontrolled and unidentified hazards that are lurking around.
It is always recommended that the JSA be carried out by those who are very familiar with the job at hand. Those to attend the JSA should consist of workers with knowledge about the job, those who would take part in the current task, the supervisors and possibly relevant specialists. Normally, the team leader is responsible and should ensure appropriate JSA measures are followed.
The leader of the team should have the competence in facilitating, developing and writing JSAs. The one leading must not necessarily be familiar with the job if the other team members are. The team should be made up of those who are going to execute the task and not just those who happen to be at the workplace.
By involving a team of people who are competent in the job and involved in the job, the likelihood of missing a step or hazard is decreased and the likelihood of efficient and effective controls increased. Workers who do the job regularly will have valuable job insight such as unsafe shortcuts, or ways to get around protective devices.
If possible, all employees who will be involved in the job should contribute to the development of the JSA. This is an effective way of encouraging employees to participate in hazard identification and risk control. It also builds a culture of understanding and compliance with the rules.
Whatever your company choose to call it, JSA is a very important safety. It's about looking at every step of a job systematically in order to identify, critically assess, and write down hazards and work practices that are safe. It is to make sure that the right controls are put in place so that the work can be done safely.
How effective a JSA would be varies greatly depending on the understanding and experience of the crew completing it and the standard of the JSA processes. There are training available that can make one improve on the consistency and quality of JSA at the place of work.
Just filling the JSA form does not make people safe during the work. It would be of almost no value to bring out hazard and develop controls if the most critical hazards are not looked at. The controls should always be appropriate, the controls should be in place and maintained and what is required should be properly communicated.
The procedure is much more important than a piece of paper that documents the process. A well developed JSA used properly is a useful safety tool. However, a poor JSA may not only be ineffective in preventing injury, but can create an additional hazard; a false sense of safety.
A poor JSA paints the picture that all the needed controls are in place and for that matter the job would be carried out safely. For this reason, members in the team may relax, not be too cautious, and would be caught in the trap of uncontrolled and unidentified hazards that are lurking around.
It is always recommended that the JSA be carried out by those who are very familiar with the job at hand. Those to attend the JSA should consist of workers with knowledge about the job, those who would take part in the current task, the supervisors and possibly relevant specialists. Normally, the team leader is responsible and should ensure appropriate JSA measures are followed.
The leader of the team should have the competence in facilitating, developing and writing JSAs. The one leading must not necessarily be familiar with the job if the other team members are. The team should be made up of those who are going to execute the task and not just those who happen to be at the workplace.
By involving a team of people who are competent in the job and involved in the job, the likelihood of missing a step or hazard is decreased and the likelihood of efficient and effective controls increased. Workers who do the job regularly will have valuable job insight such as unsafe shortcuts, or ways to get around protective devices.
If possible, all employees who will be involved in the job should contribute to the development of the JSA. This is an effective way of encouraging employees to participate in hazard identification and risk control. It also builds a culture of understanding and compliance with the rules.
About the Author:
If you are searching for the facts about job safety analysis procedures, come to our web pages today. More details are available at http://www.safetypoliciesprocedures.com/contact now.