It is not uncommon for children, and sometimes women, to disappear seemingly without a trace. It is always hoped that these kids are found and returned safely home. However, no matter the outcome, parents want to know where their missing loved ones are, and a digital forensic investigator may be able to track them if they carry any Internet-connected device.
The GPS system can now be utilized for more than just finding new restaurants and local hangouts. Police are using this Global Positioning System to track missing people and find runaway teenagers. Anyone who carries an Internet interfacing device can be tracked if the police are able to get a Court Order to do so.
Hackers in the late 1990s began showing police the potential for these technologies in missing persons cases. When they were able to get a hold of a device and bring up messages, even deleted ones, it helped the detectives create an accurate timeline. The results were so effective that there are entire groups in many larger police departments devoted to this task.
At that time GPS did not exist for the average individual, so finding the device was imperative to the investigation. In those days it was easier to delete historical data for good. However, most people were not yet aware of the fact that law enforcement was going after cellular telephones for the messages or other data they could provide, and this ignorance actually assisted them in many investigations.
These are the days when most anyone can be tracked to within a half mile of their location. All they need is to have their phone, Kindle, or other device on them and they are easily located in real time. For those who have an RFID chip inserted in their bodies (mostly only on pets), they can be found whether there is another device on them or not.
The downside to such technology is that a great deal of privacy is being eroded. However, in the United States, law enforcement must be able to obtain a court order in order to pry into such private data. Parents are regarded as having a right to monitor the whereabouts of their children via their devices, and the technology to do so has become more and more available.
The grey area about such monitoring comes with couples monitoring one-another. Whether married or not, there is a great deal of disagreement on what constitutes an acceptable degree of prying, and when it becomes stalking. Naturally, the use of electronic spying between married couples has been regarded as basically acceptable, just as hiring private investigators has been in the past.
Of course, men think they should never be spied on or monitored by wives or girlfriends while women believe that anyone in a committed relationship has a right to know what their partner is up to. Men, it seems, by and large wish to be able to keep secrets in their lives. Even those who are not cheating appear to want to keep open the potential to get away with infidelity.
The GPS system can now be utilized for more than just finding new restaurants and local hangouts. Police are using this Global Positioning System to track missing people and find runaway teenagers. Anyone who carries an Internet interfacing device can be tracked if the police are able to get a Court Order to do so.
Hackers in the late 1990s began showing police the potential for these technologies in missing persons cases. When they were able to get a hold of a device and bring up messages, even deleted ones, it helped the detectives create an accurate timeline. The results were so effective that there are entire groups in many larger police departments devoted to this task.
At that time GPS did not exist for the average individual, so finding the device was imperative to the investigation. In those days it was easier to delete historical data for good. However, most people were not yet aware of the fact that law enforcement was going after cellular telephones for the messages or other data they could provide, and this ignorance actually assisted them in many investigations.
These are the days when most anyone can be tracked to within a half mile of their location. All they need is to have their phone, Kindle, or other device on them and they are easily located in real time. For those who have an RFID chip inserted in their bodies (mostly only on pets), they can be found whether there is another device on them or not.
The downside to such technology is that a great deal of privacy is being eroded. However, in the United States, law enforcement must be able to obtain a court order in order to pry into such private data. Parents are regarded as having a right to monitor the whereabouts of their children via their devices, and the technology to do so has become more and more available.
The grey area about such monitoring comes with couples monitoring one-another. Whether married or not, there is a great deal of disagreement on what constitutes an acceptable degree of prying, and when it becomes stalking. Naturally, the use of electronic spying between married couples has been regarded as basically acceptable, just as hiring private investigators has been in the past.
Of course, men think they should never be spied on or monitored by wives or girlfriends while women believe that anyone in a committed relationship has a right to know what their partner is up to. Men, it seems, by and large wish to be able to keep secrets in their lives. Even those who are not cheating appear to want to keep open the potential to get away with infidelity.
About the Author:
When you are looking for information about a digital forensic investigator, visit our web pages online today. More details are available at http://www.jlainvestigations-security.com/core-expertise.html now.